Comments on: Lomo LCA

By: James K

James K — Wed, 06 Jul 2011 09:36:40 +0000

Kevin – Many thanks for the corrections – i’ve updated the post!

By: Kevin Meredith

Kevin Meredith — Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:33:23 +0000

Lomo LCA was inspired by the Cosina CX-2 but as the Cosina CX-2’s name implies it was made buy Cosina a Japanese company not Lomo. Aslo the Lomo LC-A went into mass production in 1984 not in the 1970’s. Maybe a little bit of research is need when the DIGTAL SLR guru is going to write about something analog.

By: Rusty

Rusty — Sun, 20 Feb 2011 15:00:28 +0000

I have both an original LCA and a new LCA+RL and I would recommend the LCA. It has much higher build quality than the Chinese made offering from Lomography. That said, if you want to shoot with film speeds higher than 400, you have to use the new LCA+

By: James K

James K — Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:56:26 +0000

izamelotov – both are great cameras. i’d go for the LC-A given a choice, purely because it is the original!

By: izamelotov

izamelotov — Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:44:31 +0000

If i want a low budget,yet easy to use and still able to produce stunning pictures,which one do you recommend,the Russian LC-A or the LC-A+…

By: António Chagas

António Chagas — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:46:52 +0000

Great review!!. Thanks.